First published on 22 July 2020 and updated on an ongoing basis; last updated on 02 February 2022 (changes detailed below); all the reviews in this Special Collection are free to access
This Special Collection is one of a series of collections on COVID-19. It is also available in Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, German, Farsi, French, Japanese, Korean, Malay, Polish, Portuguese, Russian and Spanish.
Many healthcare workers are at the front line of the COVID-19 pandemic, delivering emergency and critical care, while others continue to deliver the broader services of the health system in hospitals, clinics, offices, communities, and homes. Working under difficult and stressful circumstances that are likely to continue for some time, exacerbates existing risk factors such as occupational stress and shift work. Supporting the wellbeing of healthcare workers is crucial to sustaining our health systems during and beyond the current crisis.
This Special Collection brings together Cochrane evidence on interventions that may help support the wellbeing of the healthcare workforce and reducing occupational stress.
These reviews have been produced Cochrane Review Groups in three Networks: Cochrane Mental Health and Neuroscience; Cochrane Musculoskeletal, Oral, Skin and Sensory; and Cochrane Public Health and Health Systems. Some reviews in this collection have associated Cochrane Clinical Answers.
Please note that the reviews included in this Special Collection summarize evidence, and their inclusion does not mean that the interventions reviewed have been shown to be effective.
Updated 2 February 2022 with the addition of a Cochrane Clinical Answer to the review 'Mindfulness-based psychological interventions for improving mental well-being in medical students and junior doctors'
Interventions for occupational stress
Evidence from disease epidemics shows that healthcare workers are at risk of developing short‐ and long‐term mental health problems. The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned about the potential negative impact of the COVID‐19 crisis on the mental well‐being of health and social care professionals. Symptoms of mental health problems commonly include depression, anxiety, stress, and additional cognitive and social problems; these can impact on function in the workplace. This review aims to assess the effects of interventions supporting the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic; and to identify barriers or facilitators for implementing these. Associated Cochrane Clinical Answer: What intervention, organizational and individual characteristics impact the implementation of interventions to support frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic, or pandemic?
Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals
Resilience can be defined as the maintenance or quick recovery of mental health during or after periods of stress, resulting from a potentially traumatising event, challenging life circumstances, a critical life transition phase, or physical illness. Healthcare professionals are exposed to various work‐related stressors and are at increased risk of developing mental disorders. This review assesses interventions to foster resilience in healthcare staff delivering medical and allied healthcare. Associated Cochrane Clinical Answer: For healthcare professionals, do psychological interventions help foster resilience?Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare students
Mindfulness interventions are increasingly popular as an approach to improve mental well‐being. Questions remain regarding the efficacy of mindfulness interventions as a preventative mechanism for medical students and junior doctors, who are at high risk for poor mental health. This review assesses the effects of psychological interventions with a primary focus on mindfulness on the mental well‐being and academic performance of this population. Associated Cochrane Clinical Answer: What are the effects of mindfulness-based psychological interventions for medical students and junior doctors?
Computer‐based versus in‐person interventions for preventing and reducing stress in workers
In‐person and computer‐based (web or mobile) stress management interventions have been shown to be effective in reducing stress in employees compared to no intervention. Computer‐based interventions may be more accessible, convenient, and cost‐effective. This review aims to compare the effects of computer‐based interventions versus in‐person interventions for preventing and reducing stress in workers. Associated Cochrane Clinical Answer: For employees, how do computer‐based stress management programs compare with in‐person programs?Human resource management training of supervisors for improving health and well‐being of employees
Ethical case interventions for adult patients
Interventions for physical safety and capacity to work
Work‐break schedules for preventing musculoskeletal symptoms and disorders in healthy workers
Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis
Acknowledgements
This Special Collection was developed by Miranda Cumpston (Editor, Cochrane Public Health), working with Monaz Mehta (Editor, Cochrane Editorial and Methods Department) and Katherine Jones (NIHR Network Support Fellow, Cochrane Mental Health and Neuroscience). Colleagues from Cochrane Developmental, Psychosocial and Learning Problems, Cochrane Public Health, Cochrane Skin, and Cochrane Injuries, and Alex Pollock and Margaret Maxwell of Glasgow Caledonian University provided input on the selection of reviews.
Translation
This Special Collection was translated into [language] by [name of Cochrane Group and optionally translators] on [date of the latest translation update].
Image credit
Getty Images/Fuse
Contact
Cochrane Editorial and Methods Department (emd@cochrane.org)